To: Coleus
Is drunk driving a sufficient reason to ban the drug alcohol?I think it's just more of an opportunity for the crime to happen which will result in more traffic fatalities
You didn't answer the question. Will you?
19 posted on
11/25/2005 1:39:45 PM PST by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Know your rights
I guess since I never took an illegal drug, I find no reason for drugs to be legal or for people to get high.
Is drunk driving a sufficient reason to ban the drug alcohol?
Yes, it can be argued that way in a legislative body or court.. Are you now happy I answered your question? and I bet you do not like the answer. and yes, I do like a drink at a party and find no need to hang out at bars and drink until impairment. Nor do I ever feel a need to get high on illegal substances. I enjoy life the way it is. And don't want some drunk driver or pot or crack smoking person to end someone's life from driving while impaired. There is no right to get high or to get drunk, nor is there a right to arrive to work drunk or high increasing the rates of injury and high insurance costs for the company owner who has to pay increased costs for workmen's comp.
20 posted on
11/25/2005 1:51:55 PM PST by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson