Replies

BTW- A few thoughts about Creationsim being unsound. Is there any evidence for evolution? There aren't any evidences of inter-species change. All we have are tiny speciations and mutations that may or may not change a species. There should be tons of fossil evidence. There isn't.

Wrong on all counts. This is just a small part of the fossil evidence--there are tens of thousands of additional specimens.

BTW2- Myth actually is evidence for Intelligent Design and a flood. Every racial and religious group has had a creation myth and flood one. Usually myths are based in fact and since it occured so much throughout the Earth it probably is based in fact.

You criticize science for lack of evidence then you espouse a global flood and claim it is based in fact?

For a start, here is a decent overview of the flood evidence (or lack thereof): Problems with a Global Flood, Second Edition, by Mark Isaak.

If you want more, let me know. But first, you have to specify the date of the flood. Do you accept 2304 BC -- Answers in Genesis (+/- 11 years)?

Yeah, I pretty much accept around that time period. There is a lot of flood evidence. I personally find it important though that every culture has had an almost identical flood story seperate of each other. That's pretty cool.

With those pictures, does that show the evolution of chimps into homo sapiens? Are those ones in between supposed to be the missing links between apes and man? If so, do you have a link that tells how they are similar? I'm not really much of a archaologist so I don't really understand those pictures. For all I know all those could all be humans(shows my ignorance).

Would appreciate clarification on just what all these skulls prove? Are you saying that these are "inter-species" examples as was mentioned in the earlier email?

Is this proof that you are presenting for evolution?