Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quark2005
Had they actually found it, would you think it was a waste of time?

I say: yes. You argue practicality. Fine. What practical value do you have with that? Any time machines been built yet?

The whole world is looking for the cure for cancer, but they don't even have an effective treatment for psoriasis. Sometimes "practical" is in the eye of the beholder.

297 posted on 11/26/2005 11:19:51 AM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude
The whole world is looking for the cure for cancer, but they don't even have an effective treatment for psoriasis. Sometimes "practical" is in the eye of the beholder.

Agreed. However, to only work on science with immediate applications is rather short-sighted, I think. Sometimes one can't forsee uses of cutting edge discoveries - Heinrich Hertz didn't believe his discovery of how to produce radio waves would be of any practical use, for instance; back then it was just a curious fulfillment of a theoretical prediction of Maxwell's equations. Does the search for new elementary particles have immediate applications? No. In a hundred years, who knows? If we have, someone in thr future will be glad that the groundwork has already been laid.

392 posted on 11/27/2005 9:30:02 AM PST by Quark2005 (Science aims to elucidate. Pseudoscience aims to obfuscate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson