I've been doing this since around 1990, in many different venues. I think I've seen the worst the dark side has to offer.
You didn't answer the question. And, BTW The Democratic Underground has only be around since 2001, according to their own website.
You seem to like to throw around generalities without backing them up. I know it's tempting to do, but in a forum like this when you are making accusations, you really ought to name names, cite your sources, present your evidence. and let people respond to the accusations. Isn't that one of the things America is all about?
"You didn't answer the question."
Are you really unaware how dishonest you're being, or do you find it amusing? My answer was one that would satisfy any fair-minded person.
"And, BTW The Democratic Underground has only be around since 2001, according to their own website."
And so? I said, "I've been doing this since around 1990, in many different venues." I didn't say anything about how long DU has been around. Perhaps you haven't been around long enough to know that there have been liberal discussion venues much like DU since the days of UNEWS.
"You seem to like to throw around generalities without backing them up."
Ah, yes, the old groundless assertion. I'm starting to feel the need for a shower.
"you really ought to name names, cite your sources, present your evidence. and let people respond to the accusations."
Sounds very lofty, but in reality it's nothing but dishonest drivel. There are people here who are as knowledgeable on their subjects as any "source," and the experience and understanding of such people make a real contribution to FR. Besides, when a "source" is offered, bogus grounds are found to dismiss it.
The only thing the atheistic evolutionists have done on this thread is to deny that which the article clearly shows, and that on the most tendentious and tortured of pretexts. After seeing how you people treat evidence when offered, you simply have no standing to try and hold others' feet to the fire about "evidence."
"Isn't that one of the things America is all about?"
What, derailing discussions by trying to impose artificial "rules of evidence" that are shown to be hypocritical by your automatic dismissal of any evidence offered and your own failure to follow them? I don't think so.