Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmishDude
Brownian Motion Under The Microscope (Einstein Nobel Prize Discovery Questioned)

There was no question about Einstein's Nobel Prise in the article you linked to. I suggest that you learn how to do a conduct citation research before posting such nonsense. In fact, the article discussed experiments outside the range of Einstein's calculations (which were purely mathematical anyway; were Einstein wrong, so to Norbert Wiener.)

179 posted on 11/25/2005 6:34:34 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Stochastic
I read the article, I didn't decide to get another Ph. D. (Although physics would take a bit less time, certainly...)

But it seems to me that the results demonstrate that the Brownian-like motion is imprecise for determining the actual motion of particles. This does not contradict what I said. The math behind Brownian motion is solid.

184 posted on 11/25/2005 6:59:29 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson