Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KU prof's e-mail irks fundamentalists (Christian Bashing OK)
Wichita Eagle ^ | 25 Nov 2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 11/25/2005 8:34:07 AM PST by Exton1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 621-625 next last
To: Right Wing Professor
I have no idea what motivates one to be such a thing, and he's certainly not a scientist.

And yet he is a defender of science. Interesting.

I too taught a seminar course a couple of years back. It was called The chemical basis of evolution,... Half the class dropped after the first meeting, when they found they'd actually have to learn some science.

Why? It's not like you required any math. Anybody who can tie his own shoes can do that stuff.

81 posted on 11/25/2005 11:58:17 AM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
ID has not sought to eliminate the discussion of evolution, just to have it included. What's the big deal?

ID is not science, and it is dishonest to treat it as such. But then, you've been told this before, which makes me question the motive behind you asking something to which you already have received an answer.
82 posted on 11/25/2005 11:58:51 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
And yet he is a defender of science. Interesting.

I can name quite a few "defenders of Christianity" who have made incredibly rude and nasty comments, not to mention outright lies. Interesting?
83 posted on 11/25/2005 11:59:37 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

Comment #84 Removed by Moderator

To: dsc
The entire "mention ID in the classroom" movement arose in reaction to this.

Exactly! That's exactly what ID is. It's a reaction. The evangelical atheists don't see how they just feed it.

85 posted on 11/25/2005 12:01:55 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
The point is that this defender of science, presumably, knows nothing about science. Even the wussy qualitative stuff that passes for biology.

But the biggest environmentalists are English majors and the animal rights activists live in pet-free apartment buildings.

86 posted on 11/25/2005 12:03:53 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Exactly! That's exactly what ID is. It's a reaction. The evangelical atheists don't see how they just feed it.

What about the rational Christians who also oppose teaching ID as science? Are they feeding it?
87 posted on 11/25/2005 12:04:50 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
It doesn't matter. Whatever "rational Christians" do (I suppose others are irrational, or are they complex?) is drowned out by those whose credo is the scientific method, whose priests are self-described scientists.

I just find it fascinating that scientists get so worked up over a "non-science" but have nothing to say when junk science overflows the landscape. As long as the grants keep coming, I guess.

88 posted on 11/25/2005 12:10:13 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Anybody who can tie his own shoes can do that stuff.

You think so, huh?

Why don't you pull up, say, 20 sequences of one particular ribosomal protein, say s7, from 20 different and widely separated organisms, and cosntruct a maximum parsimony tree. Post it here, and I'll tell you how you'd have done in the course.

89 posted on 11/25/2005 12:12:52 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
It doesn't matter. Whatever "rational Christians" do (I suppose others are irrational, or are they complex?) is drowned out by those whose credo is the scientific method, whose priests are self-described scientists.

So you're saying that sticking to the scientific method is incompatable with being a Christian? I don't want to believe that you're trying to say that, but your statement seems to imply that the two are mutually exclusive.
90 posted on 11/25/2005 12:19:57 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
No, I was pointing out that our contemporary society holds some religions as sacrosanct while leaving other religions open for cheap pot shots.

Disagree.

I'm sorry you missed this obvious point. Maybe if you let go of your anti-Christian bias, you'll be able to appreciate the reality of the situation.

Your point doesn't at all follow from what you posted. You can criticize Islam any way you want in America; I do, frequently. You can't in Saudi Arabia; and you weren't at all clear where you meant.

I don't have a bias against Christianity. I do have an animus towards creationists, based on long experience.

91 posted on 11/25/2005 12:20:04 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dsc

> Just *wanting* to 'stick it to the fundies' is indicative of severe corruption of the worldview, whether one acts out or not.


Really? Do you even know what he meant by "stick it" in this context.?

> That includes freedom from having it "stuck to you" in public places.

Hardly. If you saw, say, a Scientologist or a Wahabbi on a streetcorner handing out literature, you have the freedom to "stick it" to him by handing out debunking literature, engaging in debate or even mocking. You do not exactly have the freedom to lie, but you do, as with the case with the prof, have the freedom to point out the flaws, inconsistences, lies and whatnot in your opponents worldview.


92 posted on 11/25/2005 12:22:11 PM PST by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Now, of course, there's a bit of translation that is necessary. People in the easier areas of science and in the area of humanities often create vocabulary in order to obscure their subject. As a mathematician, this baffles me, because my vocabulary is an endless search for intuitive terms.

Nonetheless, a quick search of the terminology leads to the fact that what you describe is an NP-hard problem. So, in general, it would be impossible to conduct an efficient algorithm for what you ask. Although approximation would be possible, any attempt to create a maximum tree would just be ad hoc.

But if you are in the habit of giving your students monkey-work, maybe they are able to get the measure of your field.

93 posted on 11/25/2005 12:24:19 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam
You do not exactly have the freedom to lie

Yes he does. Creationists excercise that freedom on these forums all the time.
94 posted on 11/25/2005 12:26:23 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
So you're saying that sticking to the scientific method is incompatable with being a Christian?

No, but I appreciate your attempt at creating a strawman. I am saying that believe in the validity of the scientific method is a faith. But you knew that. Unless you were being intentionally obtuse. Or you're stupid. I'll choose the former.

95 posted on 11/25/2005 12:26:24 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

Thanks for sharing your opinion.

Actually, there are many, many Christian-bashers at FR. Typically they excuse, disguise, or redefine their bashing in terms of whatever theyv'e adopted as their preferred dodge. Frequently they use the current scientistic dogma as camouflage for their unresolved (or mis-resolved) personal issues with God. Unable directly to assault God Himself, they settle for venting their bile on His people; and the harder those targets try to be true to God — which necessarily involves being true to His word — the more arrogant and abusive they become.

Dan


96 posted on 11/25/2005 12:26:49 PM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Being rude and antagonistic is protected speech.

Okay, you sold me. I think I will verbally assault some stranger on the street and then head down to the playground to call children some mean names.

Those who cite the First Amendment in order to justify crass behavior is using a coward's shield. Free speech is responsible speech, and frankly I'm tired of folks wheeling out the Bill of Rights every time they feel the need to be an a**hole. And since we are speaking frankly, I'm tired of colleges and universities protecting and paying these mealy mouthed individuals.

Free speech, free speech, free speech, decorum be damned. Everyone has the right to be a butthole while working in a publicly funded educational institution because free speech gives you the right to be a jerk. Respect means jack, cuz we got that free speech. Polite discourse is for suckers.

Whoopdie freakin' do. Just the kind of society I want to live in. Let's all embrace our right to be rude.

APf

97 posted on 11/25/2005 12:27:18 PM PST by APFel (Loose ships sink lips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

believe=belief


98 posted on 11/25/2005 12:29:08 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Exton1

It isn't "leftism" to put religious mythologies in a mythology class. It would be leftism, however, to "feel" for the other side, be politically correct, and allow unscientific stories be taught as science.


99 posted on 11/25/2005 12:29:09 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

But also there are no trees before the supposed time of the flood. They all magically start at around 4000 or so years.

And I know you didn't expect me to know all the details of those fossils. What I'm wondering though is whether we know that the fossil evidence shows the progression of the evolution of the animals(or humans) or whether we have little jumps that could be seperate animal or human groups. Like say a black, white, and Asian face are all different but the same species. Perhaps Neanderthals are another segment of the homo sapiens who were very stupid and so got assimilated. Just wondering.

I'm not trying to argue with you. Just trying to learn like the student I am. I am acting from my religious belief in that I personally know that there is a God. From there I'm trying to see which one makes more sense.


100 posted on 11/25/2005 12:29:37 PM PST by onja ("The government of England is a limited mockery." (France is a complete mockery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 621-625 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson