To: chronic_loser; WKB
you are referring to Middle Hebrew Script (below 900BC)....not Ancient Inscription.. ..to be precise.
![](http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/files/6_30b.gif)
There is a plethora of evidence out there about pictographs in the earliest Hebrew
try...www.ancient hebrew.org
The origins of the Ugarit cuneiform script is not known but can be assumed that it was derived out of the same Pictographic script used to write Hebrew, just as the Sumerian cuneiform evolved out of a pictographic script. This theory adds to the evidence that the Semitic/Hebrew script is older than previously thought.
Happy Thanksgiving.
124 posted on
11/24/2005 10:23:50 AM PST by
wardaddy
(HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (toddcaps)...lol)
To: wardaddy; tutstar
FWIWJMHO
If God gives someone a word of wisdom or knowledge
or a revelation through the vehicle of "Speaking in Tongues"
and no one can give an interpretation then who benefits?
1 Corinthians 14:4 He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church.
5 I would like every one of you to speak in tongues,£ but I would rather have you prophesy. He who prophesies is greater than one who speaks in tongues,£ unless he interprets, so that the church may be edified.
6 Now, brothers, if I come to you and speak in tongues, what good will I be to you, unless I bring you some revelation or knowledge or prophecy or word of instruction?
144 posted on
11/24/2005 3:19:24 PM PST by
WKB
(If you can't dazzle them with brilliance.. then Baffle them with BS)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson