Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy
That's how Darwin might define it...

If you had a seance like Hillary talking to the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt...

Fact is, Darwinian theory (“Origin of Species”) suggests exactly the opposite: Mammals reproduce sexually (anatomically, that means a penis and vagina).

While sterility is not always voluntary, human actions are always a choice... the same is true of homosexuals, regardless of their perverted proclivities...

216 posted on 11/26/2005 9:29:00 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Perhaps in your haste to reply you misunderstood what I said. "Survival of the fittest" as Darwin meant it denotes reproductive fittest and not the fastest or strongest or whatever. Anything that prevents a species from having success in leaving offspring to the next generation is maladaptive. Exclusive homosexuality is exactly that. That's why I wrote that Darwin might indeed have said that homosexuality was a birth defect, defined broadly.
220 posted on 11/26/2005 10:37:51 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson