[A. Pole]

OK, I re-read. You presented this "explanation" of special "combination of genes", made it into a proven fact and drew the conclusion.

"Since homosexuals--by their behavior--take themselves out of the gene pool, it is an interesting question and one that more answers await more research."

It is a how-wash. How the REAL and HONEST research is possible if the condition of pro-homosexual brainwashing, PC hysteria prevails? Honest and intelligent researchers will stay a mile away from this stinking topic.

The new false dogma is more strongly entrenched than Lysenko-ism was under Stalin's rule.

[Pharmboy]

Ironic that YOU mentioned Lysenko, since his idiocy revolved around discounting genetics and placing all his beliefs into environmental influences. Aside from the awful effects of central planning, Lysenko was also responsible for the yearly agricultural shortages in the old Soviet Union (but I'm sure you knew that). And, I of course acknowledge that human behavior is a bit more complex than the best genes and growing conditions for potatoes.

Back to the gays...you implied that I "...presented this "explanation" of special "combination of genes", made it into a proven fact and drew the conclusion."

No--I never used the term "proven fact." I believe that common sense and much data would lead people into believing that male homosexuality is largely genetic.

Male sexuality is largely driven by visual sexual cues...T&A. This is not something straight males can be talked out of...it is what it is. True male homosexuals do not respond to this. Also, the fact that many gays knew they were so oriented from the time they were children is another common sense fact for genes. Further, in a Darwinian sense, it would be totally illogical to leave such important issues as those surrounding reproductive success up to environmental "chance."