Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative
I don't mean to be a logistics wonk but...

Why not retrofit the C-5 with the F117 engine (P & W 2040) that the C-17 uses to reduce your spare parts inventory?

Granted a little less thrust, perhaps an upgrade/push would benefit both airframes.

Now if it was a hybrid pylon down upgrade and used the C-17's Nacelles and reverser's that may be sweet.

37 posted on 11/24/2005 4:40:41 AM PST by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: taildragger
Why not retrofit the C-5 with the F117 engine (P & W 2040) that the C-17 uses to reduce your spare parts inventory?

Probably because the TF-39 used on the C-5 was the ancestor of the CF6-80C2. The engines are similar enough to not require major redesigns of other subsystems on the C-5. They are also similar to the engines used on Airforce One and the E-4B's.

42 posted on 11/24/2005 6:44:59 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson