Maybe I missed something, but the article didn't say he was permamnently disabled, it said he was seriously injured. Since when does a "serious injury" qualify one for worker's compensation for life; ESPECIALLY a 17 year-old illegal?
From the article:
...for the teen, who was partially paralyzed while working on a home...
Maybe I missed something, but the article didn't say he was permamnently disabled, it said he was seriously injured. Since when does a "serious injury" qualify one for worker's compensation for life; ESPECIALLY a 17 year-old illegal?""
Seems to me that the price of a hit man would be FAR cheaper than the $240 a week for life.
This 17 y/o doesn't have a long life ahead of him, I bet.