[FlyVet]

Surely someone on the Left must be smart enough to see this....

The ones who are smart enough don't care. She is their tool. Bought and paid for. Since she's raising so much cash, I'd like to see a list of her big-time donors, so we know their agendas and what she owes them.

Just think, for the next three years the mediots will be pounding it home that Hillary! is the Second Coming, our god and saviour, while undermining anything and anyone conservative. I remind myself what awful candidates Gore and Kerry were, and how close they came. Can Hillary! deceive enough people? I don't know. But I don't think it's a given that she can't.

[Mia T]

 

I think the dynamic is different with missus clinton.

To call missus clinton 'polarizing' is, at best, an act of compassion. 'Polarizing' implies support by one's side, but, as we know, many on the Left do NOT support missus clinton.

A more accurate description: missus clinton is despised universally on the Right and not insignificantly across the ideological spectrum. Many on the Left resent her cutting in, resent her sense of entitlement, resent her manifest lack of qualifications, resent her corruption, resent her unconcern about damaging the party.

Missus clinton will be the instument of her own defeat because she will mobilize the GOP like nothing we've ever seen before and mobilize many on the Left either to field an alternative who is qualified, uncorrupt and likeable... or to stay home.

Moreover, what we see now is likely hillary's apogee. With 100% name recognition and virtually 0% abuse-of-power/abuse-of-women/terrorism-failure recognition, clinton support can only go in one direction... and it isn't up.