Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

"Is one who has no heterosexual tendencies, though he may have had them in the past, no longer heterosexual?"

Yes


201 posted on 11/23/2005 8:30:54 PM PST by jec1ny (Adjutorium nostrum in nomine Domine Qui fecit caelum et terram.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: jec1ny
"Is one who has no heterosexual tendencies, though he may have had them in the past, no longer heterosexual?"

Yes

Well, now you are twisting yourself into knots in order to be consistent with your previously-stated contention that homosexuals who experience only passing thoughts about other men are no longer homosexual.

So, is the non-heterosexual priest androgynous? I'm curious as to how far out on this limb you're willing to go.

205 posted on 11/23/2005 8:41:14 PM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson