But it's ok for the Darwin Fundies to claim they know how God did it. Great double standard.
P.S. Good essay. The immediately operative question in the school trial that has gotten the Darwinists so riled up is not whether ID should REPLACE Darwin in the schools, but whether science teachers will be allowed to mention that there's this book in the library that questions Darwin, if they have enough curiosity to consult it in their spare time.
The Darwinists won't even allow that to happen, without bringing the full majesty of the law to bear to shut all opposition up.
Does it really matter what Darwinists think? Like I posted earlier, while it would be interesting to know how the creation of the world happened, the important information here for believing Christians is that He did the creating. That Darwinists find this concept to be "unscientific" is their problem, not mine.
"But it's ok for the Darwin Fundies to claim they know how God did it. Great double standard."
Well, at least the "darwin fundies" tend to have science and data behind them.
And if I might add. . .
Doesn't it take a lot more faith to believe that this was all an accident of (what is the current guesstimate) 25 million years than it takes to have faith in a Creator?