[Dustbunny]

Let me see if I have this straight.

There was no leak because it was common knowledge that Valerie Plame worked at the CIA as an analyst.

Libby is going on trial for 'lying' to the grand jury about a leak that never really happened. What Libby told the grand jury and what the MSM Democrat reporters, who had an agenda to get rid of the Bush Administration, told the grand jury was different.

Wilson, Valerie Plame's husband has a problem with the truth. He cannot keep his 'stories' straight but Libby is the one going on trial.

Now we have Woodward saying he knew that the leak was not from Libby because he knew that Plame worked for the CIA as an analyst long before Libby did.

Talk about confused, none of this makes any sense and contains absolutely no logic.

[smoothsailing]

The key to it is that Libby isn't charged with lying about a leak or even a leak that never happened. He's charged with lying about who first told him the name and occupation of a woman ( I forget her name) who was not a covert CIA agent.

Of course all the real liars are writing books, doing TV interviews and otherwise plotting and attempting to execute the overthrow of a sitting President.

But hey, Sherlock Fitshooey is on the case and he's gonna slap them donkeys all the way to the White House.