Posted on 11/22/2005 12:28:26 PM PST by Icelander
According to their About Us page, Tancredo and Bay Buchannan are the only chairpersons of that PAC.
It did go through, and thank you.
LOL!
Even that doesn't describe it. He's been actively hostile to border security. Any President who, among other things, submits a budget to Congress that leaves out funding for Border Patrol agents that Congress had just authorized, and smears the Minutemen as "vigilantes" when he knows for a fact that they're anything but, can only be described as having the same views as the people who wrote that CFR recommendation. Anyone who puts this in the same category as Black Helicopters or similar such nonsense is a moron, plain and simple.
You're right...I don't know what I was thinking.
I'm so mad about this, I could spit.
Well, if that means coming up with a good candidate for '08, I'm all up for that. But if despite our efforts we don't get one, I wouldn't consider it smart to just vote for him. When the difference between the two major candidates gets below a certain threshold, then it becomes advantageous in the long term to vote for a third candidate who'll signal to the major parties what it is they lack.
I would especially advocate this for people who don't live in battleground states.
Unfortunatly, many others don't get it.
I don't care to bring 'conservatives' over to my side because they already are. I'm at least as conservative as you. You're just mentally deficient - that's the difference.
Second, I don't need to appeal to someone to try to save their own country.
How is that working for you?</sarcasm>
It's kinda comical, but typical.
They have won, you just haven't noticed.
There was a joke bacl when Goldwater was dirty tricked with the A-Bomb add, that went something like this.
They told me if I voted for Goldwater Taxes would go up and the Vietnam war would expand. Well I voted for him and sure enough they were right.
How illogical. This seems to say that successfully reducing Hispanic immigration now might be a political winner in 08 and 12 but you'd pay for in 16 as the electorate becomes increasingly Hispanic but you actually made the electorate less Hispanic if you succeeded in 2008 and 2012.
A whole lot better than it is for your candidates. No sarcasm needed.
"I don't care to bring 'conservatives' over to my side because they already are. I'm at least as conservative as you. You're just mentally deficient - that's the difference.
Second, I don't need to appeal to someone to try to save their own country."
Oh, I see now, if I don't want to vote for a RINO to prevent a real conservative from winning a primary, that makes me "mentally deficient". Good luck with that!
yeah....
I would rather have Sanford as he is already a Governor....
we will see...it's going to be interesting....
I think legal immigrants who THINK, are against illegal immigration. They should, at least, because they are the most affected by illegals. I have not seen statistics on this assumption of mine, but I have the gut-feeling legal immigrants get for the most part low-skilled, low-paying jobs... which the illegals take away from them when they come along and accept lower working conditions. Please correct me if I am wrong on this one.
Sorry but you do need it. Here have a smily face maybe that will make you feel all better<(•¿•)>
Don't change the truth one bit, you still have an open borders president, who has spent more money that any president in history. And probably the only one who never vetoed a single piece of legislation in two terms.
But the libs hate him, so therefore he must be on our side.
(was somebody mentioning something about sarcasm, by the way? ;-)
I can't because FR now saves resources by cutting post histories short (I checked)...but you've defended NoPardon's positions as well as other dubious characters in the past.
Let's see: You brashly post opinions as if they should be regarded as facts, you insulted Extremely Extreme Extremist (who I think is a stand up-guy despite having moderating duties), you're a jockhead and work on a lot of presumption while playing an excellent dupe for political correctness. On top of that you trash the only Rep out there consistantly standing up for your culture's continuence while presuming it's beyond threatening. I wrote a lot more but thought it was beyond cruel. I acknowledge that I don't know squat about sports, any real sense in Free Trade policy, how an amnesty is good for our country, why preserving what's left of our culture is a bad thing or why blindly following a cult of peronality is good just because that personality is a Republican. I'm going to keep my weapons regardless.
I'm not fond of wasting time and effort so I call myself off. Write me off the Christmas card list (especially if they all wish people "Happy Holidays") and know that I do wish you the best.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.