Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Irontank
Not quite spot on. I doubt the left was happy with O'Connor's dissent in the recent Raich case. Scalia, on the other hand, concurred with the left-wing majority of the Court in that case. Speaking of New Deal era Constitution-twisting, he based his concurrence on Wickard vs Filburn.
7 posted on 12/04/2005 6:30:24 AM PST by publiusF27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: publiusF27
I doubt the left was happy with O'Connor's dissent in the recent Raich case. Scalia, on the other hand, concurred with the left-wing majority of the Court in that case. Speaking of New Deal era Constitution-twisting, he based his concurrence on Wickard vs Filburn.

Very true...I've long believed (as I've posted on here many times) that Scalia has become quite a disappointment...from his implicit criticism of Justice Thomas' refusal to be constrained by bad prior Court decisions...to his acceptance of the doctrine of 14th Amendment incorporation of the BOR against the states...to his Commerce Clause decisions...Scalia is a distant second to Thomas in terms of his fidelity to the words and original meaning of the Constitution

8 posted on 12/05/2005 6:31:07 AM PST by Irontank (Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson