Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop
Not only did Iraq have weapons of mass destruction, we captured some of them and brought them home to the United States. Why the Bush administration has not made a better case of articulating the overwhelming facts on these matters, I do not pretend to understand. ---

***

No kidding!

5 posted on 11/20/2005 10:49:35 PM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not an exit strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beyond the sea
The facts are clearly. I am amazed people think that Saddam didn't have any evil designs on any one. What do they think we did when we kept our troops for over a decade in Saudi Arabia and imposed no-fly zones over most of his country if we didn't perceive him as a mortal threat? Make no mistake, Saddam may not have had nuclear weapons but that's only because we removed him from power. There is not a shadow of a doubt, left to his own devices, he would have obtained them eventually and either used them against us or given them over to terrorist groups to use against us. We're a lot safer today because President Bush acted decisively to eliminate that threat to our country. Its existence was not in dispute. It is beyond me why people have decided not to see the truth in front of their own eyes.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

8 posted on 11/20/2005 10:56:49 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson