Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator; Jeremiah Jr

Perhaps it's a "reflex" action:

>>>In Hebrew, disengagement is hitnatkut . Interesting word. It is a euphemism for a plan that combines withdrawal and separation, both concepts that have negative connotations. Indeed, at first, Sharon and his advisors referred to their plan as tochnit ha-hafrada , the "separation plan." An aide to Sharon told me a recently that separation sounded bad, particularly in English, because it evoked apartheid.

Disengagement is neutral. Hitnatkut is a little tricky. It is derived from the root n.t.k , which means disconnect or sever. It is conjugated in binyan hitpa'el , which typically implies either a mutual, reciprocal action, or a self-inflicted action. It's a modern word. It sounds clean, surgical, simple. No wonder that it was immediately picked-up by savvy advertisers on Israel radio (commercials for a cell-phone company and for an insurance company feature the term, with a wink.) You may know the words nituk (denotes disconnecting or hanging-up the phone) or netek (a disconnect). <<<

http://www.israelcentersf.org/tzavta/word-of-the-month-previous.asp


10 posted on 11/20/2005 6:10:26 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal (As it was in the days of NO...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Thinkin' Gal
It is derived from the root n.t.k

Is the "t" a tet or a tav? And is the "k" a kaf or a qof?

11 posted on 11/20/2005 6:14:12 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vehe'emin BeHaShem, vayachsheveha lo tzedaqah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson