[MACVSOG68]

My post was in relation to the above. You stated doubts on the political mendacity of polling organizations and I wanted to show that rampant bias does exist. I stand my my statement that conservatives don't need media polls to bolster our position.

No, I stated that a 2% error is understandable, but that a 35% error from every polling group in the country was dubious. And I'm sure you're equally dubious of polls that reflected American support for the President and war in 2002.

And you end your rant by inferring that I see everything rosy. Not true, I'd rather work with my team to correct things than attack perceived weaknesses.

Didn't realize I was ranting. I thought maybe it was you who was doing that. My mistake. As for attacking perceived weaknesses, I never consider strategies by the Democrats as perceived weaknesses. They should be taken seriously and countered.

Since you've cloaked yourself in righteous indignation, you're right, we have nothing more to discuss. For the record, I noticed your condescension also.

Funny, but for someone to come onto this thread and immediately attack me on a false premise (polls), you have a strange sense of who is claiming righteous indignation. As for condescension, you are quite able to exude enough for the both of us.

[Kitten1]

This day has been another learning experience on FR.

1. I didn't attack you,I posted my experience with pollsters. If you consider that an attack, oh well.

2. My statement on perceived weaknesses was in reference to Republicans, not democrats.

3. Now pointing out condescension is condescension.

4. As you stated earlier, we have nothing more to discuss.

I have no intention of wrecking the Sunday thread with bickering. Apologies to Alas, MNJohnnie, Rodguy.

You can argue by yourself.

Last time I try to give another point of view on FR.

[rodguy911]

Sorry buddy but you have been scratched badly by the kitten,IMHO.