I make not that again you refuse to answer the question:
What would you say to your child if mommy (or daddy) though innocent, was sentenced to death?
Face it your a hypocritical group-thinker. It's acceptable to you that innocent persons are put to death by the state, except, when it is you or one of your loved ones.
To have a group the individual must first exist. For, without the individual there can be no group. It's absurd to think the individual can be sacrificed and it will better for the group.
jt, As I said in my post 112, which you responded to but not the part where I removed the situational ethics rationalization you used to obfuscate around answering the question: Heck, it doesn't even have to be your child, what would you say to any person that suffers a loved one wrongly put to death by the State? I wonder what rationalization would you put forth to deny the reality that it's impossible to correct the injustice of an innocent person put to death.
Zon.
"Face it your a hypocritical group-thinker" Here we go again.
Read the post just above.
DO NOT TRASH TALK ok?
"It's acceptable to you that innocent persons are put to death by the state, except, when it is you or one of your loved ones."
I'm going to wire you 10 dollars via Western Union or Paypal after you substantiate the claim above which I allegedly made.
Quite the contrary, I don't waver in my convictions based on whose family is affected!
You know......the "situation ethics thing" I've mentioned several times?????
The situation ethics thing that I DON'T believe in??
Get it Zon?
BTW, I see the 112 where you maintain you removed SI from your argument. Do you know what SI is Zon? Go back and review it yourself as I'm tiring of this now.....look midway down your posting and what do you see?
"DNA has proved that the wrong persons received the death penalty"
Still waiting for that info Zon.
Finally wrt "I wonder what rationalization would you put forth to deny the reality that it's impossible to correct the injustice of an innocent person put to death."
Where did I offer such rationalization or indicate that such rationalization even existed?
I said it would be Morally Wrong to execute the innocent.
Are we clear? I hope so.