Skip to comments.
Did Texas execute an innocent man?
Houston Chronicle ^
| Nov. 19, 2005
| LISE OLSEN
Posted on 11/19/2005 4:20:16 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181 next last
What a pile of crap. It is obvious even form this biased story that they executed the right man. This is just run to try to undercut the death penalty.
To: Ninian Dryhope
I've yet to see them produce evidence he was innocent. The absence of evidence is not proof the death penalty was unjustly sought against this murderer.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
2
posted on
11/19/2005 4:22:19 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Ninian Dryhope
3
posted on
11/19/2005 4:22:50 PM PST
by
denydenydeny
("As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist"--Sheikh Omar Brooks, quoted in the London Times 8/7/05)
To: Ninian Dryhope
What a pile crap
Maybe next time the dumbass reporter will try to uncover these "facts" before they execute the perp.
I don't know...maybe the left always needs a victim.
To: Ninian Dryhope
... a Houston Chronicle investigation suggests... Need anyone read further?
5
posted on
11/19/2005 4:25:33 PM PST
by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: Leapfrog
Uh huh. A murderer and the truth in the same sentence is an oxymoron. But you can't count on the liberal
Houston Chronicle to acknowledge how absurd it is. Every murderer in history has claimed innocence. So what?
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
6
posted on
11/19/2005 4:28:33 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Ninian Dryhope
Lise Olsen "..Lise Olsen is being recognized for her series "Uncertain Justice," about the death penalty in Washington . She spent nearly a year tracking WSBA records, judges' reports on death-penalty cases, and interviewing serial killers for a review of two decades of capital punishment in Washington . Based largely on her findings, the Washington State Supreme Court revamped its rules for lawyers in death-penalty cases in June of this year. Starting next year, every death-penalty lawyer used in Washington cases must be certified as qualified by a Supreme Court subcommittee. Ms. Olsen's series earned awards from the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Thurgood Marshall Award, sponsored by the Death Penalty Information Center.
Ms. Olsen often writes about civil rights and criminal justice. One of her previous stories about immigrants being held indefinitely led to a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court case, in which the Court called the practice unconstitutional. .."
To: Ninian Dryhope
Um... obvious????
Not only has the key eyewitness recanted, even the prosecutor thinks they got it wrong.
People need to realize that as long as there is capital punishment, there will be some innocent people put to death. To say otherwise is pure folly.
This case appears to be one of those cases. This is the main reason I am against capital punishment - you can't fix mistakes!
8
posted on
11/19/2005 4:31:45 PM PST
by
al_again
To: Ninian Dryhope
>Did Texas execute an innocent man?
It'd be awfully amazing if the count was as low as one or two.
9
posted on
11/19/2005 4:32:27 PM PST
by
gungafox
To: Ninian Dryhope
I can tell from the amount of words before there was any description of the crime that this article is not written to illuminate the truth of the matter, but to demonize the death penalty.
10
posted on
11/19/2005 4:33:41 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Democrats think 1984 is an instruction manual)
To: Ninian Dryhope
this story needs a barf alert
11
posted on
11/19/2005 4:33:48 PM PST
by
Charlespg
(Civilization and freedom are only worthy of those who defend or support defending It)
To: Ninian Dryhope
But, he sounds like such a fine upstanding sort, I'm sure they made a mistake. </sarcasm> One less to worry about.
12
posted on
11/19/2005 4:33:49 PM PST
by
barker
(If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence try ordering somebody else's dog around.)
To: Ninian Dryhope
13
posted on
11/19/2005 4:34:28 PM PST
by
SouthTexas
(What part of NO don't you understand?)
To: al_again
This is the main reason I am against capital punishment - you can't fix mistakes! Sure you can fix mistakes. That's why I support retroactive abortions...emanating penumbras of the Constitution that enable us to abort Hitlery and other feminazis with rusty coathangers. /semi-sarc
14
posted on
11/19/2005 4:34:28 PM PST
by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: Ninian Dryhope
If he were "innocent", who killed the first "innocent" victim and shot the second "innncent" victim?
The defense (the people attacking the death penalty) better provide 100% proof of who DID DO IT, before they can conclude Cantu DIDN'T do it.
15
posted on
11/19/2005 4:36:38 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
To: Ninian Dryhope
...before emptying at least nine more rounds into the only eyewitness a man who barely survived to testify. Nice shot!
16
posted on
11/19/2005 4:36:47 PM PST
by
HIDEK6
To: al_again
People are also wrongly imprisoned, sometimes for 30-40 years before being freed. Sometimes they die in prison.
Let's just not have prisons at all since some innocents get convicted. /sarcasm
17
posted on
11/19/2005 4:36:51 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
To: Ninian Dryhope
If Garza and Moreno lied, and this resulted in a death, couldn't they be charged with something a lot more serious than, say, perjury?
18
posted on
11/19/2005 4:38:27 PM PST
by
isrul
To: al_again
If you accept the premise that mistakes will be made in the current system, couldn't you favor a new higher standard for the application of the death penalty? There is nothing saying that it has to be all or nothing.
Just as you can argue that a mistake can be made in the application of the death penalty I can argue that life in prison does not mean life in prison (parole, or escape) and they kill again.
19
posted on
11/19/2005 4:40:39 PM PST
by
warrior9504
(All gave some. Some gave all.)
To: goldstategop
The absence of evidence is not proof the death penalty was unjustly sought against this murderer. It seems the people involved disagree with you.
BTW, innocent till proven guilty. If the story is accurate, I see no proof.
20
posted on
11/19/2005 4:41:34 PM PST
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson