Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traderrob6

Someone should ask Woodward if he is referring to 'Libby' as 'former'.

He may still consider him 'current' in status.

I think the idea that this person may have 'never' testified leads to the need for a new Grand Jury.

A former official would more likely have been out of the loop a lot earlier.

'former' official plus 'never testified' narrows the field of possibilities.


49 posted on 11/19/2005 11:00:48 AM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: new yorker 77

Woodenhead has already said Libby never so much as mentioned the Flame to him, "but" he told the Fitz that is was possible, he told Libby about "her."


65 posted on 11/22/2005 6:30:25 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson