Yes, you nailed it.
Less witnesses means less chance of contradiction. This clown Fitzgerald wants to frame somebody good and he only wants to let in that testimony which supports his agenda. This is why he has had "meets" with people prior to bringing them in before the gj. He wants to know ahead of time exactly what questions to ask and what the answers will be.
It would not surprise me at all to find out that Fitz has had lunch with both Corn and Pincus.
I may have nailed. However, you have summarized what this left wing POS has been doing and apparently is trying to do:
"Less witnesses means less chance of contradiction. This clown Fitzgerald wants to frame somebody good and he only wants to let in that testimony which supports his agenda. This is why he has had "meets" with people prior to bringing them in before the gj. He wants to know ahead of time exactly what questions to ask and what the answers will be."
Yep, compartmentalize and never ask a question that you don't know the answer. Prearranged data insures the right questions in the Grand Jury.
"It would not surprise me at all to find out that Fitz has had lunch with both Corn and Pincus."
He probably had them report to one of his junior staff meetings. The jr staffer aske prearranged questions while Fitzy looked. After the prearranged questions, Fitzy told Corn and Pincus, we will not need your testimony.