Woodward's Source Never Testified Before Grand Jury (A lawyer in the case said)

Reuters via CNN Netscape ^ | November 18, 2005

[Logical me]

"Any DA when they want to frame innocents do this little trick all the time. They compartmentalize or as in this case refuse to call on the real culprits and witnesses. "

You got that right. Worked for the courts 27 years and typical. These real culprits will probably be on the Defense list of witnesses and Fitzzzzzz will have one hell of a time supporting his case against Libby. His "save his ass" charges will be so confusing that any jury will look at Fitzzzzzzzz and shake their heads.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Dumb question
Would Valerie be questioned as to whether or not she told anyone her CIA status?

[CFC__VRWC]

I read earlier today here that the blogs are buzzing about Pincus - that he may have reason to sweat.

[Grampa Dave]

"You got that right. Worked for the courts 27 years and typical. These real culprits will probably be on the Defense list of witnesses and Fitzzzzzz will have one hell of a time supporting his case against Libby. His "save his ass" charges will be so confusing that any jury will look at Fitzzzzzzzz and shake their heads."

With your experience of 27 years in the courts, the charges against Libby probably made you laugh and mad at the same time. You know better than most of us, how this game is played with a very weak or no case.

[Ursus arctos horribilis]

Woodenhead has already said Libby never so much as mentioned the Flame to him, "but" he told the Fitz that is was possible, he told Libby about "her."