Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mia T
3- Actually, you would be sacrificing your deeply held beliefs. By placing a de facto vote for hillary clinton, you would be making the most anti-life vote imaginable. You would be putting all of our children at risk, the born and the unborn, alike.

Hello????? McFLY????? Is anybody home????

I didn't say I'd be doing that. I said there are millions upon millions of Americans who don't think like we do about politics, or even care all that much about politics. They don't strategize about voting and politics. They go to vote when they see something/someone they like. Most of the time they don't vote. That's the way it is. I can't change it. You can't change it. No amount of lecturing will ever work, or even reach them becasue they don't read FR or pay much attention to political news and debate.

All we can do is continue to stick to our guns and nominate appealing candidates that draw out the silent conservative base, once known as the Silent Majority. It exists. We just haven't been doing much to get their attention lately.

48 posted on 11/20/2005 9:19:13 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: ElkGroveDan
Glad to hear that.

As for mobilizing the Right, fear not. If hillary is their candidate, I think we'll see mobilization like we've never seen before.

As Chris Matthews said Friday, "I think Pee Wee Herman would give her a race."

49 posted on 11/20/2005 9:25:04 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson