To: glow-worm005
Uh Oh. Time for more backtracking and revisionism by evolutionists.
Them facts are stubborn things.
11 posted on
11/18/2005 2:22:12 PM PST by
Elpasser
To: Elpasser
Uh Oh. Time for more backtracking and revisionism by evolutionists. You say that as if welcoming fact-induced change to the ToE is a bad thing.
To: Elpasser
> Time for more backtracking and revisionism by evolutionists.
But wait! I've been told by Creationists that Evolutionists do not want to talk about changes to the theory! Don't tell me that - GASP! - some Creationists *lie!*
15 posted on
11/18/2005 2:49:35 PM PST by
orionblamblam
("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
To: Elpasser
"Time for more backtracking and revisionism by evolutionists."
Since evolution is science, it is subject to revision and changes. Unlike, oh I don't know, creationism?
16 posted on
11/18/2005 4:15:33 PM PST by
sagar
To: Elpasser
"Uh Oh. Time for more backtracking and revisionism by evolutionists.
Them facts are stubborn things."
This in no way changes the ToE. This just pushes back the origin of grasses. Nobody is *backtracking*. The only things that it revises are established theories in paleobotany, not evolutionary biology. Unlike creationism, science actually changes when faced with new evidence.
17 posted on
11/19/2005 10:50:35 AM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson