But he's not Cindy Sheehan. He's a decorated war veteran and acknowleged big-time supporter of our military and troops. I thought he made an appealing presentation, unlike a Cindy Sheehan, and I think it a miscalulation on the Republican leadership's part. I am merely suggesting that it was a ploy that may well backfire, by providing the anti-war movement with a credible leader.
al Jazeera plastered his speeches all over the world and they are going to now have to say that his positions lost.
Which shows the world that free countries and free cultures are capable of tolerating dissent and nobody gets shot (or banned!)
Hmm.. sounds like you're feeling some heat there.
Try posting at DU and see how tolerantly you are treated.
Benedict Arnold was a far more "decorated war hero" than Murtha and better respected.
John F'in Kerry has far more purple hearts than Murtha does.
Pulling home some guy,who did NOT complain, but whose father didn't want him in the war, is hardly being a "big-time supporter of our troops" and neither were his words this past week, in support of our military.
You are sounding more and more like a Dem. You are using DNC talking points and making a bout as much sense as they do...which is none.
If you really believe what you are posting, then you 1) are stupid 2) a sleeper troll 3) both 1 and 2.
Giving aid and comfort to an enemy, is NOT a good thing and you deserved to be banned.
Have you served as a Marine? Do you know what Semper Fi means... I know you do. Do you believe in social justice, if so to what extent.
Show yourself and say what you really mean or go to confession.
No body that really can be elected the next President will be so stupid as to lead the anti-war movement. Certainly, credible and anti-war don`t really go ttogether.
Al Jazeera is a sign of a free country? I`m going to fix another scotch, maybe you should pass.