[Nanny7]

I.D. is a position, just as Darwinian evolution is a position. The Pa. issue is/was the exclusivity of evolutionism. In the Scopes trial, the issue was the exclusivity of creationism. To maintain modern elitist dogma, evolutionists want to censor (keep from students) data that may suggest the i.d. position so now the roles are reversed. Now who wants to deny science?

[B.Bumbleberry]

Darwin's theory is subject to scientific examination and has been extensively, the ID position is not. That is the crucial distinction. And maybe you could share with us examples of how scientific "data" has been suppressed because they tend to prove ID.

[WildTurkey]

evolutionists want to censor (keep from students) data that may suggest the i.d. position keep quackery out of the classroom.

There. Fixed it.

[lugsoul]

I challenge you to present a single instance of evolutionists attempting to censor "data." A single one.

Evolutionists may challenge ID theory as not being developed through the scientific method, but I don't think you can present a single, solitary example of them attempting to prevent 'data' from being taught in a science class.