Except here is the rub. A scientific theory can be modified by data points when they no longer fit within the framework of that model. So I am certainly open to "junk" evolution should evidence (real, verifiable, peer reviewed) come along that is at odds with the evolutionary model. Religion on the other hand (being set down by God) has no checks and balances. Our notions of God are completely subjective as apposed to objective. So with that in mind, do you wonder that all of us (living in a solipsistic universe) have our own ideas of what God is? How then can you use "God" to define or help define the observed models we create to describe this physical universe?
So back to belief. Does your belief in the Bible allow you to rewrite or junk the parts of it that are shown to be no longer true as we continue to increase our collective knowledge as a species? Science works just that way. We junk or modify old theories and models as we discover new information that requires us to re-evaluate those models.
I am pretty sure science would say the resurrection of Jesus was impossible yet I believe it.
I've certainly heard some biblical advocates here argue that some or all of the old testament are no longer applicable, and that other parts of the bible are allegorical. The most amazing posters seem to think that every word is literally true, and are prepared to discard the entire body of physical science if it gets in the way of their views.