Posted on 11/18/2005 4:34:43 AM PST by StatenIsland
The quote by Sam Francis is about the Janet Jackson - Justin Timberlake Superbowl Show.
But that wasn't the point, was it? The point was not just to hurl a pie in the face of morals and good taste but also of white racial and cultural identity. The message of the ad was that white women are eager to have sex with black men, that they should be eager, and that black men should take them up on it.
...
Breaking down the sexual barriers between the races is a major weapon of cultural destruction because it means the dissolution of the cultural boundaries that define breeding and the family and, ultimately, the transmission and survival of the culture itself.
I Am Spartacus!!!
Sorry....wrong thread.
That's B.S. (BTW, it's also literally Naziesque. That each culture is associated with a specific tribe or ethnicity -- and that "blood" determines culture -- was the PRIMARY presupposition of Nazi ideology. See, for instance, Alfred Rosenberg's The Myth of the Twentieth Century. Without jumping to conclusions, I'm advising other freepers to keep a close eye on your rhetoric, RobbyS.)
According to your homepage you're a Texan, and therefore an American. Your own culture -- the American culture -- is the creation of hundreds, if not thousands, of tribes. Even Texas culture is a rich amalgam contributed to by many tribes (e.g. ethnic Germans, Hispanics, and whoever it was that developed barbecue).
Heck you can even go back thousands of years to, for instance, Rome, and find a multi-tribal origin of it's culture -- Etruscan and Latin -- and later deep incorporation of cultural elements from many others from Greeks (Greek culture itself also being multi-tribal) to Germans.
I'm very happy in an interracial marriage. And her cultural values are certainly more moral and conservative than many on these threads. What kind of a breakdown is that?
An excellent, well-written article.
Thank you.
Of course evolution is not the enemy of God. Evolution is the mechanism God used to create life.
The problem (OK one of the problems) with ID and its proponents is that THEY are the ones that diminish God. The ID view is that God couldn't get it right to begin with, so He had to tinker with the system afterwards.
Prepare yourself for the Blaspneme Legion's counterattack.
Thanks for the ping!
I'm here! What can I do for you, Stingy Dog?
Likewise.
The good Dr.K is really gonna piss off the snakefondlers with this one.
You have accidentally hit rhe nub of the matter. Sociobiology is hated because it raises questions asssociated with Nazism. But Nazism did not come from nowhere. It was a bastard child of Darwinism, because Darwinism was quickly appropriated by those looking for a scientific vehicle that could carry the notion that some human groups were naturally inferior to others.
In a society such as ours with a faith in egalitarianism, that is a dangerous notion, and for that reason sociobiology is unwelcome. It weighs heavily on the soul of anything who ascribes to the doctrine that all men are created equal.
Hey! Get a clue! Despite what the Creatio-fascists would like, this is a Chat Room.
Sorry, Junior, but mlc9852 is correct. It's the subject of an implied verb "is", as in "better than he is".
In You treat her worse than I treat her, t. is a strong or subordinating conjunction, attaching an adverbial clause to its owner worse. In You treat her worse than I, the same account may be given with the explanation that there is an ellipsis of treat her; or t. may be called a weak or coordinating conjunction linking the two similarly constructed nouns you & I. In You treat her worse than me, the same two names for t. are possible, but the ellipsis is of you treat (not treat her), or the similarly constructed nouns her & me (not you & me); those are the possibilities if the sentence is said with the only sense that an educated person gives it. But an uneducated person may mean by it You treat her worse than I treat her; &, if it is to be so taken, t. is not a conjunction of either kind, but a preposition governing me. Doubts whether a word is a presposition or a conjunction or both are not unknown...It is obvious, however, that recognition of t. as a preposition makes some sentences ambiguous that could otherwise have only one meaning, & is to that extent undesirable.
Boldface added by me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.