A citizen-sponsored, grass-roots-type impeachment?
You ask an intriguing question!
The evidence is strong enough to satisfy me that Bill is a violent criminal, although Hillary is probably more white-collar as regards underworld activity. I would feel justified in attempting a citizen's arrest, although I'm sure the Secret Service would tackle me before I got the first sentence out.
Since we're not congresscritters and he's not in office, this is pretty much a non-starter.
The best we can do is to make fun of him while working to make sure he doesn't become First Lady when his supposed spouse makes a run for the Presidency.
After eight years of abuse from these two, it is a real question whether the Secret Service would take a bullet for either of them... so I seriously doubt that they would mind your citizen's arrest. In fact, I'd bet that they would assist you. As for clinton criminality and violence, I suspect hillary surpasses bill on both counts. |
"She is angry. Not all the time. But most of the time." author Gail Sheehy
|
"[Hillary Clinton] is in a perpetual state of suspended anger...." former Clinton adviser
|
"Hillary hit him between the eyes. She was angrier than Paul had ever seen her. 'You f**king Jew bastard!' she screamed." author Jerry Oppenheimer
|
[W]hen White House Counsel... Abner Mikva finally bowed to the law and delivered subpoenaed documents, she and her White House scandal team lashed at him with such a vicious streak of humiliating profanity that he resigned. Barbara Olson
|
"Anyone that stood up... was smashed down and belittled,very personally. [N]ot only would she sort of humiliate you in front of your colleagues or whoever happened to be around, Hillary tended to kind of campaign against people behind their back, and that was certainly my experience." former Clinton press secretary Dee Dee Myers
|
Longtime Hillary aide Carolyn Huber, who saved Mrs. Clinton's buns in 1996 with a convenient cover story about how her mysterious Rose Law Firm billing records magically appeared in the White House book room, described the former first lady's fits of rage to Sheehy as nearly lethal. "The person on the receiving end never gets over it," Huber remembered, reportedly shivering as she spoke those words. Hillary's Scheme
|
The rages continued even after Mrs. Clinton took up residence in the White House, where she blew up at a Secret Service agent for declining to carry her bags. When the agent explained that he needed to keep his hands free in order to protect her, she replied, "If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags." Joyce Milton
|
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS FOR THE CHILDREN, FOR AMERICA, FOR THE WORLD madhillary.com (coming soon) hillarytalks.blogspot.com COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 |
You can't initiate an impeachment.
However, you can, if you're on a grand jury, lead that grand jury any damn way you want it to go that the facts logically lead. Little known fact. Check out section B here:
http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/frames/241/kaditxt.html
for the history.
Not surprisingly, if you look here:
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:fdCMhevcLagJ:www.moed.uscourts.gov/Jury/FederalHandbookForGrandJurors.pdf+grand+jury+broad+&hl=en&client=firefox-a
you will see very little mention of the latitude grand juries actually have to investigate individuals under federal or state laws. But if you are on a grand jury, and you have enough people pissed off at Clinton, you could, of course, get the grand jury to inquire into some stretchy indictment of Clinton on federal or state charges. Dunno which (maybe federally, defrauding the government, or abuse of office, or something like that exists that could be bent to stretch there) but bear in mind the judge AND prosecutor will fight tooth and nail, all the way, to stop you. They do NOT want the public acting on their own--they want the process controlled, by THEM. And bear in mind that whatever crime the grand jury is investigating MUST have taken place in the district in which the grand jury is empaneled, and must have been a violation of law at the time, AND must still fall under the statute of limitations, of course.
That'd be the best shot I can think of for getting those bastards, finally. But it's not a real good one.