Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Not a Special Prosecutor for Hillary Campaign Fraud Affair?
peterfpaul.com ^ | 11-16-05 | Peter F. Paul

Posted on 11/17/2005 7:52:06 AM PST by doug from upland

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2005 7:52:08 AM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Umm, because she's a Democrat named Clinton?

(That, and the lack of courage from our side)

2 posted on 11/17/2005 7:53:25 AM PST by airborne (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I will burn incense and pray for just that.

"Almighty God of Truth and Justice, hear my prayer..."


3 posted on 11/17/2005 7:53:53 AM PST by Danae (Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: doug from upland

Bush is trying to be on the high moral road and making a major mistake.


5 posted on 11/17/2005 7:58:26 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Republicans don't use Viagra?


6 posted on 11/17/2005 7:59:37 AM PST by polymuser (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

It just wouldn't work. Remember her senate campaign? Her opponent got too close to her and was accused of getting into her space? The media's complicity with her would mean that she would be made into a martyr. And the Clinton's know so well how to use and abuse the media's love affair with them.


7 posted on 11/17/2005 8:07:33 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

It would be nice if this Paul guy wasn't such a sleaze.


8 posted on 11/17/2005 8:12:07 AM PST by exDemocratbutnotRepubican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
(1) A special prosecutor is appointed when suspicion falls on the President or someone close to him, since his own Attorney General could not be expected to be impartial. You don't need a special prosecutor to investigate someone in the opposition party. (Of course, this assumes that the Attorney General is equipped with a pair and actually goes after the opposition.)

(2) Given the awful records of special prosecutors — spending mega-bucks and generally coming up with only minor, ancillary indictments — I don't think it wise to call for a new special prosecutor under any conditions.
9 posted on 11/17/2005 8:14:16 AM PST by Sarastro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemocratbutnotRepubican

Welcome to FR. It would be nice if you knew his full story and if you actually knew him.


10 posted on 11/17/2005 8:16:40 AM PST by doug from upland ("Susan Estrich...get off your kneepads" - Juanita Broaddrick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Because she knows how to lie to a grand jury.


11 posted on 11/17/2005 8:20:13 AM PST by Redleg Duke (9/11 - "WE WILL NEVER FORGET!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Like a lot of people, I've been wondering why there hasn't been a full-scale investigation into this. Seems like where there is a lot of smoke, there just may be a fire. If there isn't anything to it, just clear the air and move forward, but if there is something to it,(and I think there might be), let it all come out and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law, and get Hillery a few new recipes for chocalate chip cookies as I think she might need them for where she is going to go.


12 posted on 11/17/2005 8:24:37 AM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Definitely would be good payback for the Support ole billy gave Bush yesterday.


13 posted on 11/17/2005 8:28:06 AM PST by PureTrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarastro

Under ordinary circumstances you wouldn't need a special prosecutor to investigate someone outside the White House. However,because of the extraordinary and unprecedented situation of the hierarchy of the opposition party being accused of conspiring to violate campaign finance laws and obstruct the federal investigation into that vioilation, in order to avoid the appearance of partisanship in the prosecution of these charges, a special prosecutor would be the only one who could legitimately prosecute this case.

If anyone from the Bush Administration sought to indict and publicly try together the Chairman, a President and a Senator from the opposition party, it would be politically untenable. Only a neutral, apolitical and respected independent prosecutor could enforce the law in this case. that agrument would be understood by everyone.

If nothing is done, and no effort is made to hold political leaders accountable because they are political leaders, then we have confirmed to them that they are above the law, and immune from any prosecution no matter what they do.

I will be filing a new complaint against the DNC and its former two chairmen, at the suggestion of the FEC itself, for their role in this affair, as the FEC has admitted it has not investigated it based on my original complaint against the Clintons, which is still open as an investigation.


14 posted on 11/17/2005 8:34:07 AM PST by krucader_bravepages_com (the mother of all whistleblowers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: exDemocratbutnotRepubican

In response to the sleaze characterization by the media intended to discredit me so that the irrefutable facts I expose about the Clintons and DNC hierarchy can be ignored, please note the following:

1. My felony convictions from the 1970's were all related to my anti-Castro/anti-Communist activities while a leading international lawyer and developer of World Trade Centers.
2. My standing with conservatives was enhanced because of those activities, as demonstrated by their support for me and my new activities when I relocated to California in 1986 and was embraced by Ronald Reagan's Kitchen Cabinet.(Henry Salvatori, ernie Hahn, Holmes Tuttle financed Constitution Bicentennial Foundation I presided over in Los Angeles)
3. I worked with, or my activities were personally endorsed by, Chief Justice of the United States Warren Burger, President Reagan after he left the White House, President Bush 41, the President of Poland, President Yeltsin of Russia and the Ambassadors from the People's Republic of China. I also worked with Paul Weyrich and Free Congress foundation in the early 1990s.

All the characterizations of me in the media such as Forbes, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, People etc, pre February, 2001, (BEFORE I became a whistleblower), were full of accolades and recognition of various accomplishments. The forces arrayed against me when my public company joined 300 other dot coms in closing in December, 2000, turned logic on its head when i was accused of destroying the public company that my family held more than $50 million in stock in when it collapsed. I lost more than any other single shareholder, and made no profit from the Stan Lee Media stock when all the dust settled.

Stay tuned to other news that will vindicate me.


15 posted on 11/17/2005 8:50:48 AM PST by krucader_bravepages_com (the mother of all whistleblowers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: krucader_bravepages_com

Are you Peter F. Paul?


16 posted on 11/17/2005 9:10:51 AM PST by exDemocratbutnotRepubican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: krucader_bravepages_com

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr18828.htm

Peter Paul indictment


17 posted on 11/17/2005 9:11:41 AM PST by exDemocratbutnotRepubican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: exDemocratbutnotRepubican

The indictment referred to the actions of my codefendants who acted on their own to enrich themselves on stock i owned that they took control over. They were all employees with modest salaries and they each embezzled over $1 million from me through some of the transactions described, when I had a net worth of more than $70 million.

My only motive all along was to protect my stock and my company from short sellers and insders that were exploiting weaknesses in the market and the company. I paid almost $2 million at Bill's request in order to benefit the company and its shareholders from the "rain making" services of an ex-President to be provided when he left the White House to help me build my global company. I did everything I could to keep the company afloat until January 21, 2001.

Clinton and his intermediary,Jim Levin,(both defendants in my civil suit for business fraud) who testified at the Rosen trial that he was Clinton's "eyes and ears" in dealing with me on Clinton's behalf, deprived my company of a $7 million dollar investment scheduled for November, 2000. They both interfered with my Japanese partner, Tendo Oto, and induced him to form an American subsidiary of his Japanese company with Levin and Clinton in Chicago, making Levin the managing director,in November 2000. Clinton met with Oto in the White House at Clinton's last state dinner I had him invited to in late September, 2000, and convinced Oto not to invest the $7 million with me but to go into business with Clinon and Levin. After Clinton sent Levin to japan secretly in October, 2000, Oto ended up doing just that. He suddenly renegged on his promise to make the $7 million investment he promised in November, and the sudden loss of the $7 million left my company cash poor in a hostile market surrounded by collpasing dot coms in late November, 2000.

I did everything possible, including investing another $1.4 million of my funds into the company in October-November, 2000, to keep it afloat, but was not successful because of the agendas of those around me who profited from my destruction.


18 posted on 11/17/2005 9:44:23 AM PST by krucader_bravepages_com (the mother of all whistleblowers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: krucader_bravepages_com
Here are the articles of incorporation as filed by Jim Levin with the backing of Clinton. Levin's business experience dealt with running his parnets' fence company in Skokie, Illinois and owning a strip club in Chicago that invented the lap dance. Based on this business acumen he became the managing director of the US subsidiary for the largest Japanese manga, internet animation company.

19 posted on 11/17/2005 9:57:17 AM PST by krucader_bravepages_com (the mother of all whistleblowers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: krucader_bravepages_com

And Levin is now in jail. He also gave a million bucks to the Clinton Lie-brary.


20 posted on 11/17/2005 10:01:56 AM PST by doug from upland ("Susan Estrich...get off your kneepads" - Juanita Broaddrick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson