To: Labyrinthos; dennisw; SJackson; Liz
I think it speaks to the fact that Libby's recollections might honestly be muddled, that he didn't lie under oath, and that this whole case in fact is a muddle. And to evoke an old quote, where does Libby go to get his reputation back? Not just among Democrats and the MSM, but others who have attacked him viciously?
8 posted on
11/17/2005 5:21:57 AM PST by
veronica
(What will "Ronnie" think? The question that obsesses the internut clowns...)
To: veronica
Oh I agree with you on that issue, but the "muddled recollection defense" is compelling even without Woodward's latest revelation.
To: veronica
I think it speaks to the fact that Libby's recollections might honestly be muddled, that he didn't lie under oath, and that this whole case in fact is a muddle. And to evoke an old quote, where does Libby go to get his reputation back? Not just among Democrats and the MSM, but others who have attacked him viciously? He doesn't, this just demonstrates the skill of the conspirators, they can get to anyone, so they got Woodward.
79 posted on
11/17/2005 7:03:09 AM PST by
SJackson
(People have learned from Gaza that resistance succeeds, not smart negotiators., Hassem Darwish)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson