Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Hill
Miller's calls to groups suspected of funding terrorists had tipped them off to the raid and allowed them time to destroy evidence.

See post #147.

I hope most newspaper editors don't share your view that good reporters should simply pass on information from sources who "should have known what they were talking about."

A little critical thought and evaluation of sources before using them would help a little, no?

246 posted on 11/17/2005 12:44:50 PM PST by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: huck von finn

That's a charge. Has it been proven?


248 posted on 11/17/2005 12:45:57 PM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

To: huck von finn

"I hope most newspaper editors don't share your view that good reporters should simply pass on information from sources who "should have known what they were talking about.

A little critical thought and evaluation of sources before using them would help a little, no?"

Well, the NY Times certainly agrees with you and hates Miller for reporting that there might be WMD in Iraq or that Saddam might be seeking them.

Was she wrong? I'm not so sure she was. But in any case she was reporting what the leadership of our country and every other country was being told.

Shouldn't we know that?


250 posted on 11/17/2005 12:48:59 PM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson