Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Hill

He was probably also trying to worm his way into that woman's confidence, if the incident in the movie was true. Reporters are slimy like that.


143 posted on 11/17/2005 9:10:09 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: expatpat

Not that it matters, but Woodward was barely a reporter at the time of Watergate. He never went to J-School (which is probably a plus) and had only worked for a year on the (laughable) Montgomery County Sentinal.

This was his first real story. Which is why they didn't follow any known journalistic rules (as slack as they are) and they felt comfortable lying their asses off.

Woodward became an instant and never learned the concept of fact checking -- or truth telling. Of course in that respect it is fitting that he is the patron saint of modern journalism.


145 posted on 11/17/2005 9:14:50 AM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson