Did I misunderstand the underlined sentence you wrote in Post #222 on this thread? The sentence is constructed so as to clearly imply you are a prosecutor.
To: js1138
Once you demonstrate that national reporters have lied about this, or have incredibly faulty memories, how are you going to get a jury to convict?
As a prosecutior, it's the integrity of the investigators that I am concerned with. The reporters are a sideshow, as is the CIA to be honest.
This is a question of whether Libby told investigaotrs that he called CIA to check Plame's status for himself. Do you believe Libby "forgot" to mention that to investigators? Or do you believe the prosecution, that Libby intentionally withheld that fact.
The challenge to the prosecution will be to diminish the "was she outed" question; and the strategy of the defense is to keep raising the "was she outed" question.
222 posted on 11/16/2005 5:56:02 AM PST by Cboldt
In any case, why is it so important to you that Libby be guilty of something?
Yes, you did.