Okay, but it's a argument of sophistry on your part to object to the term "testimony." Counts 2 and 3 of the indictment recite those dates and that testimony as the object of "false statement" offenses, which are a crime under 18 USC 1001(a)(2).
Yeah, it's the Martha Stewart offense - it was BS then, and it's BS now.
How in the world is anybody going to prove that Libby made false statements? The only thing Fitzgerald has got now that Woodward finally admitted his role is a reporter's word against Libby. Reasonable doubt is all over the place in this.