Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jude24; redpoll
why should the rest of America pay to let you live in a remote village?

If I'm remembering correctly, this money was from the federal portion of Alaska's gasoline tax and as transportation money couldn't be spent on other budget items.

redpoll, is that even close to being correct? :)

7 posted on 11/16/2005 4:04:45 PM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DumpsterDiver

Yeah, I think it was specially earmarked for that purpose.


9 posted on 11/16/2005 4:06:00 PM PST by redpoll (redpoll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DumpsterDiver
Alaska ranks 47th in population, it's receiving more earmarked federal highway money than all the other states except California and Illinois.

Near bye in Washington they are getting about $84 per capita in the special "earmarked" projects, compared with $1,448 for each Alaskan.
29 posted on 11/16/2005 4:21:12 PM PST by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson