To: Coyoteman; taxesareforever
Evolution is about change, not origins. Seem to my that ID is more aboput origins than change. If that is the case, why do evolutionists attack ID? Based on your statement the two have nothing to do with the other.
Darwinian evolutiuon certainly did address the origin of life when I was in school; the whole primordial soup thing. Problem is advancement in the sciences clearly established the impossibility of such a claim, so much so that evolutionists had to simply drop all references or inferences about the origin of life.
To claim that evolution never address the origin of life is a lie.
To: connectthedots
To claim that evolution never address the origin of life is a lie.Really? Then tell us, what did the first self-replicating organism evolve from? You can't answer that because that's like asking what's south of the South Pole.
75 posted on
11/16/2005 11:06:56 PM PST by
jennyp
(WHAT I'M READING NOW: Art of Unix Programming by Raymond)
To: connectthedots
Seem to my that ID is more aboput origins than change. If that is the case, why do evolutionists attack ID? I didn't realize ID advocates were engaged in research into biogenesis. The folks at the Discovery Institute said ID hasn't done any research.
101 posted on
11/17/2005 5:24:03 AM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: connectthedots
Darwinian evolutiuon certainly did address the origin of life when I was in school; the whole primordial soup thing. Problem is advancement in the sciences clearly established the impossibility of such a claim, so much so that evolutionists had to simply drop all references or inferences about the origin of life. Care to cite any peer-reviewed literature/science texts to back this (absurd) claim?
111 posted on
11/17/2005 7:24:26 AM PST by
Quark2005
(Science aims to elucidate. Pseudoscience aims to obfuscate.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson