And that is why the main support for the plaintiffs' claim is a mountain of press clippings built on a molehill of statements allegedly made by one board member who, troubled and wrestling with the addiction of Oxycontin, occasionally allowed people to put words in his mouth.So all the perjury issues are dismissed in a simple, one-sentence paragraph. Except I seem to recall that both Buckingham and Bonsell had "P-word" problems.
Exactly. It's a problem, unless the defense is arguing they are BOTH scarfing down narcotics......
;-)
Think about this for a minute folks; the Dover School Board consisted of a ding-bat with an eigth-grade education, a guy popping Oxycontin to the point where he couldn't control what he was saying, and another one who lied thru his teeth under oath. And we are asked to trust these same people to decide what the definition of science is supposed to be instead of relying on the leading scientific experts in the world?
Give me a break.....