Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dangerdoc

"You can gassify it and then run it through a conversion plant and create methane, methanol, ethanol, or about anything you can make with petrochemicals."

The primary objection I hear is that both biodiesel and ethanol yield less energy as a fuel than is required to manufacture them. Any thoughts or observations on this?


80 posted on 11/16/2005 5:05:52 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry



I am more familiar with ethanol, see above post.

I think the problem with biodiesel is that they are using the heat value of the seed oil as the final measured product, ignoring the other products produced. It's late, let me clarify. You start with a whole plant, take the seed and throw away the rest. You then squeeze the seed and get a little oil, ignoring the left-over protein and carbohydrate. You then treat the oil with a little alkali and end up with a little biodiesel. By the time you calculate planting, fertilizing, pesticide, harvesting, hauling, processing, there is alot of energy and money invested is that tiny fraction of the plant.


87 posted on 11/16/2005 7:34:06 PM PST by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson