"Sigh....you all really have to actually read the indictment and not just press accounts of it. It is independent of whether or not Plame was or was not covert. It all deals with contradictory statements under oath. Even if both claims were false he still has a case."
well I don't know where you went to law school, but if Joe diGenova Esq. says Fitzgerald will need to drop the charges then my money's on diGenova!
next case...
[...if Joe diGenova Esq. says Fitzgerald will need to drop the charges then my money's on diGenova!..]
No I did not go to law school, but I did read the indictment. My impression is the questioning was phrased to stumble Libby into lying. However, Libby used a lot of words like "may have", "could have", "not sure". Libby deliberately avoided validating Russerts assertion that Plame was an agent.
I'm with you. Next case!
Then we agree to disagree. You've got your pet lawyer, while I read the indictment.