Posted on 11/16/2005 10:12:23 AM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - House and Senate negotiators struck a tentative deal on the expiring Patriot Act that would curb FBI subpoena power and require the Justice Department to more fully report its secret requests for information about ordinary people, according to officials involved in the talks.
The agreement, which would make most provisions of the existing law permanent, was reached just before dawn Wednesday. But by midmorning GOP leaders had already made plans for a House vote on Thursday and a Senate vote by the end of the week. That would put the centerpiece of President Bush's war on terror on his desk before Thanksgiving, a month before more than a dozen provisions were set to expire.
Officials negotiating the deal described it on condition of anonymity because the draft is not official and has not been signed by any of the 34 conferees.
Any deal would mark Congress' first revision of the law passed a few weeks after the Sept. 11 terror attacks. In doing so, lawmakers said they tried to find the nation's comfort level with expanded law enforcement power in the post-9/11 era — a task that carries extra political risks for all 435 members of the House and a third of the Senate facing midterm elections next year.
For Bush, too, such a renewal would come at a sensitive time. With his approval ratings slipping in his second term, the president could bolster a tough-on-terrorism image.
The tentative deal would make permanent all but a handful of the expiring provisions, the sources said. Others would expire in seven years if not renewed by Congress. They include rules on wiretapping, obtaining business records under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and new standards for monitoring "lone wolf" terrorists who may be operating independent of a foreign agent or power.
By noon, House Democrats on the panel were issuing objections to the seven-year expiration, arguing that since the House had endorsed the four-year expiration dates enacted as part of the Senate bill, the three provisions should "sunset" at four years, not seven. They also complained that Republican negotiators shut them out of the last phase of talks, a charge Republicans deny.
The draft also would impose a new requirement that the Justice Department report to Congress annually on its use of national security letters, secret requests for the phone, business and Internet records of ordinary people. The aggregate number of letters issued per year, reported to be about 30,000, is classified. Citing confidential investigations, the Justice Department has refused lawmakers' request for the information.
The 2001 Patriot Act removed the requirement that the records sought be those of someone under suspicion. As a result, FBI agents can review the digital records of a citizen as long as the bureau can certify that the person's records are "relevant" to a terrorist investigation.
Also part of the tentative agreement are modest new requirements on so-called roving wiretaps — monitoring devices placed on a single person's telephones and other devices to keep a target from evading law enforcement officials by switching phones or computers.
The tentative deal also would raise the threshold for securing business records under FISA, requiring law enforcement to submit a "statement of facts" showing "reasonable grounds to believe the records are relevant to an investigation. Law enforcement officials also would have to show that an individual is in contact with or known to be in contact with a suspected agent of a foreign power.
Not included are several "add-on" bills to which Democrats objected, including measures to limit federal appeals of state court decisions, require that sex felons face up to 20 years in prison for failing to comply with registration requirements, and tighten courthouse security.
Can't wait to see this. If it is watered down, libs will say the President doesn't care about Americans. If it stays the same, libs will say the President is a Fascist.
Paging Karl Rove
They are Imbeciles BUMP!
Big Brother up in FedSoc says we've always been at war with Eas'asia, so who am I to argue with the telly.
DoublePlusGood game of Footy last night, what?
Oh, that'll be a big help...
As far as I know, not one of my state's Reprehensibles have surveyed the people of this state on that issue. Who are they talking to? where are they doing their talking? Except for the ever-increasing infringements upon Constitutional freedom and their ever-expanding appetite for more revenue confiscated from the masses, Washington might as well be Oblivion when it comes to hearing from those sent there on "our behalf".
Isn't it funny how the FBI can "secretly" acquire any information about a person and not be required to disclose they've demanded that info, yet when they need to do a hatchet job on "a person of interest", the department conveniently leaks info like a seive???
Thanks for posting, a sad day for Freedom and Liberty and America.
I would encourage all citizens to contact their Representative and Senators on this issue. TONIGHT!
I emailed my Rep and Senators .... per the article it gets voted on Thursday in the House and by week's end in the Senate .... I don't know who's on the committee .... your last post about how FR has changed was sadly true ... maybe I'll repost tonight and see what happens ...
several "add-on" bills to which Democrats objected, including measures to limit federal appeals of state court decisions, require that sex felons face up to 20 years in prison for failing to comply with registration requirements, and tighten courthouse security.
One wonders what is objectionable about any of that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.