No, I've been told.
No one has cited a quote, a fact, a date, a figure, let alone the actual words of a statute. I note that I am the first person on this thread to even cite concrete historical facts - namely the central role that Harry Anslinger played in the history of American drug enforcement.
In your previous post to me you acknowledge the racist tactic of Anslinger
What "racist tactic"? I said that it would not surprise me that a man born in rural PA in the 1890s may have been a racist, but that nothing about his career suggests that his campaign was motivated more by race than by a bureaucrat's instinct for job security.
Phony righteousness; it appears that is the only type of righteouness found anymore, phony.
I'm not sure what supposed righteousness you're talking about. You and your pals are the ones who feel they are righteous enough to stand in judgment over all of American drug enforcement and convict it as just a racist cabal - despite the fact that many of the men who fight and die in the war against the distribution of narcotics are intelligent principled black men who consider themselves to be fighting on behalf of their community as well as mine.
Some actual hard facts that can be quantified and referenced would be nice.
(Does reading it yourself count as being shown or told?)