Which is irrelevant. What's relevant is the chemical in the plant and its abuse.
"Which is irrelevant."
No, it isn't. It is the whole point.
Seriously, what were you thinking when you posted that? The government should have no power to say what naturally occuring plant can be grown. The government does not trump God.
L98Fiero: Nope, it doesn't. Weed is consumed in it's natural form.
Moonman62: Which is irrelevant. What's relevant is the chemical in the plant and its abuse.
The chemical in the plant is virtually identical to one
your body produces. Can we outlaw that chemical and
force all people to take another drug to destroy this
chemical along with the portion of the body which
produces it, so that receptors for this chemical
remain empty?
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What genius of design is reflected in the flower of this
herb which was gifted by God to man and beast at the very
beginning of time? Within its flower it mirrors the
chemistry of the mind and within its seed it mirrors
the substance of the body to nourish it with the most
complete and absorbable combination of amino acids
required for sustenance of any plant on the
face of Earth. What is more relevant than the sowing
of such a seed in the face of those sowing only seeds
of discord? Warring against each other over flowers
is a revolting development in this countries history
for many reasons which are undeniable fact. Sowing
the seeds of peace need not be done by men in black
masks and black armor in the middle of the night.
"Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the gift of God?" --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia, 1782.