I despise Fieger. That said, this case seems to me to be nothing more than an abuse of office by Cox. How can he claim to have credibility in a "he said, he said" case when he openly admits to deceiving his wife. If he can't be honest with his wife, what is supposed to make us think he would be honest with us?
"I despise Fieger. That said, this case seems to me to be nothing more than an abuse of office by Cox. How can he claim to have credibility in a "he said, he said" case when he openly admits to deceiving his wife. If he can't be honest with his wife, what is supposed to make us think he would be honest with us?"
Let's pull this one apart and look at it....
1. Fieger is an ass... but if I'm in a liability suit I want him to by MY ass. He's one of the top 10 liability attys in the country.
2. How do you leap from a man cheating on his wife to an abuse of office in one sentence? It is possible for a person to honor the integrity of the office even tho he had an affair (one does not prove the other).
3. You do know that Fieger is going after Cox's job, right? That Fieger is running for Atty General?
So then Mike Cox can't count on your support in his run for Governor? Seriously, it is reactions like yours that blackmailers count on to make their threats work.
King David ordered the death of another man in order to cover up his own infidelity with the man's wife, yet ultimately God forgave him. Now, I'll be the first to admit that Cox is no King David, but maybe there's a lesson in there somewhere?