To: Kelly_2000
So basically I can derive from your comment here that you first made an assumption about ME. Took that to the next level and started to get hostile based on a preconceived view of my opinions without, giving me the courtesy of deciding what i think for myself. Is that it in a nutshell?I meant nothing hostile. I was simply trying to see how you reconcile your Christianity with your denial of the idea that life was intelligently designed.
It appears I have struck a nerve with you. So since it is obvious that you don't want to answer any of the questions I have posited, I will stop asking them.
Carry on.
To: P-Marlowe
"I meant nothing hostile. I was simply trying to see how you reconcile your Christianity with your denial of the idea that life was intelligently designed. " OK thats fine please proceed to post 677 where I presented my views and perspectives unambiguously and in crystal clarity. I look forward to hearing your informed opinions after that :-)
700 posted on
11/17/2005 6:38:49 AM PST by
Kelly_2000
( (Because they stand on a wall and say nothing is going to hurt you tonight. Not on my watch))
To: P-Marlowe
"It appears I have struck a nerve with you" No I just am a little unsure why you seem to be pointedly ignoring my previous posts? Why is that?
again it's in post 677 :-)
701 posted on
11/17/2005 6:40:20 AM PST by
Kelly_2000
( (Because they stand on a wall and say nothing is going to hurt you tonight. Not on my watch))
To: P-Marlowe
"So since it is obvious that you don't want to answer any of the questions" Bizarre? I again mention for the 5th time now that I have responded to you in post 677 can you please take a look.
702 posted on
11/17/2005 6:41:32 AM PST by
Kelly_2000
( (Because they stand on a wall and say nothing is going to hurt you tonight. Not on my watch))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson