Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: furball4paws
So now you say there's two kinds of ID, the supernatural kind and the kind we all do every day?

I'm merely addressing what an ID hypothesis has to include.

Two things are clear: 1) one need not appeal to supernatural agents to make an ID hypothesis; and 2) there is no logical requirement (despite your insistence) that an ID hypothesis must include a supernatural component.

The rest of it is baggage being added by you.

Want to rethink "coy" as appropriate?

No need. However, I do begin to wonder if "intentionally dense" might be an apt addition to your resume.

388 posted on 11/16/2005 2:06:45 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

You explicitly said that what I do is ID. The "inventor" of ID, Behe, says the designer is God.

Therefore either I am God and order you back under the rug you crawled out from or you are being coy.


400 posted on 11/16/2005 2:17:11 PM PST by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson