I've asked this same question but did not get a reply. - CAN ANYONE ELSE ANSWER THIS?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1515133/posts?page=21#21
Novak: "After the case is concluded."
You responded to: "I think where Robert Novak wrote a column stating he would reveal what he knew after the special prosecutor wrapped up?
I've asked this same question but did not get a reply. - CAN ANYONE ELSE ANSWER THIS?"
by saying that Novak promised to do so "after the case was closed"
Isn't the likely reason Novak never went to jail etc. is because both of his sources were interviewed by Fitzgerald and admitted they had been Novak's sources? If so, then a) he has no need of finding this out directly from Novak; OR b) in light of his sources already revealing themselves, Novak may have felt comfortable confirmingg this for the grand jury: there would be no point in pulling a Miller-like
go-to-jail stunt to protect a source that was no longer hidden etc.